Non-polymer PFAS can build up in blood protein of animals, and is not always removed quickly. This means that predators eating PFAS-contaminated food will have higher levels in their bloodstream, and concentrations can increase up the food chain. Studies suggest that build up of PFAS is similar to those of other Persistent Organic Pollutants such as DDT.PFAS are estimated to be settling in arctic regions at rates of tens to hundreds of kilograms per year (25-850kg per year), depending on the specific PFAS chemical in question. Certain PFAS are released as gases to the environment and are blown a long way by wind and air currents in the atmosphere,. These gas PFAS will over time degrade to more persistent chemicals like PFOS and PFOA. This may be one reason why PFAS of environmental concern have been found in remote regions such as the Arctic as well as near PFAS production sitesPFAS including PFOS and PFOA have been found in air samples around Europe. The chemicals are found in small quantities, but appear in almost all samples tested. PFAS enters the atmosphere both from factories and the air inside our homes. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17554424 PFAS is found in treated waste water from industrial and domestic sources and has been found in both rivers and groundwater. Conventional drinking water processes will not remove PFAS.PFAS-coated clothes that are thrown away will often end up either incinerated or in landfill. Unless incinerated at very high temperatures (>1000oC), fluorinated polymers could release more harmful PFAS during burning. PFAS of environmental concern have also been found in landfill leachate. Non-polymer PFAS are used in the production of fluorinated polymers. The manufacture of stain-resistant finishes generally releases these PFASs into the environment, both by air and water emissions. They are very hard to remove during water treatment. Workers in textiles factories are some of the population most exposed to these potentially harmful chemicals. Small quantities of PFAS will be removed during wash and wear of products containing PFAS. This includes fluorinated polymers used on stain-resistant coatings, and non-polymers that remain on clothes after production (Lassen et al. 2015).Most UK waste still ends up in landfill, and this includes PFAS-containing products. Studies have shown that the liquid coming from landfills (known as leachate) often contain non-polymer PFAS chemicals. In the USA the total quantities were estimated at 563-638 kg in 2013. To properly break down PFAS chemicals high temperature (1000oC or more) incineration is recommended. Incineration of municipal waste does not necessarily reach these temperatures (min temp. required is 850oC), and the incomplete breakdown could release non-polymer PFAS.Wash and wear of clothing that contains PFAS-based stain-resistant or water repellent finishes release PFAS to the environment. Coatings are thought to lose effectiveness after 20-30 washes. This can include non-polymer PFAS, remnant from production or as a break-down product of side-chain polymers (Lassen et al. 2015). The manufacture of stain-resistant finishes releases PFAS into the environment, both by air and water emissions. PFAS are very hard to remove during water treatment. Industrial emissions are estimated to be the biggest source of these chemicals to the environment.

PFAS & Pesticides: A case for comprehensive action in the UK – References

  1. OECD. Reconciling Terminology of the Universe of Per-and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances: Recommendations and Practical Guidance Series on Risk Management No.61 JT03479350 OFDE. (2021).
  2. Brunn, H. et al. PFAS: forever chemicals—persistent, bioaccumulative and mobile. Reviewing the status and the need for their phase out and remediation of contaminated sites. Environmental Sciences Europe vol. 35 Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-023-00721-8 (2023).
  3. van Gerwen, M. et al. Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) exposure and thyroid cancer risk. EBioMedicine 97, (2023).
  4. Wang, W., Hong, X., Zhao, F., Wu, J. & Wang, B. The effects of perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances on female fertility: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Environmental Research vol. 216 Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.114718 (2023).
  5. Phelps, D. W., Connors, A. M., Ferrero, G., DeWitt, J. C. & Yoder, J. A. Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances alter innate immune function: evidence and data gaps. J Immunotoxicol 21, (2024).
  6. Brusseau, M. L., Anderson, R. H. & Guo, B. PFAS concentrations in soils: Background levels versus contaminated sites. Science of the Total Environment 740, (2020).
  7. Byrne, P. et al. PFAS River Export Analysis Highlights the Urgent Need for Catchment-Scale Mass Loading Data. Environ Sci Technol Lett 11, 266–272 (2024).
  8. Environment Working Group. Interactive map: PFAS contamination in wildlife. https://www.ewg.org/interactive-maps/pfas_in_wildlife2/map/.
  9. Uhl, M. et al. PFASs: What can we learn from the European Human Biomonitoring Initiative HBM4EU. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health vol. 250 Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2023.114168 (2023).
  10. Letter to UK Ministers from PFAS Experts on need for Regulation.
  11. Water industry calls for PFAS ban and blames ‘failed regulatory system’ for sector’s poor performance. https://www.endsreport.com/article/1915492/water-industry-calls-pfas-ban-blames-failed-regulatory-system-sectors-poor-performance.
  12. What are Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals (EDCs)? | Breast Cancer UK. https://www.breastcanceruk.org.uk/what-are-endocrine-disrupting-chemicals-edcs/.
  13. CHEM Trust, F., Marine Conservation Society, W. and & Countryside Link, B. C. U. Regulating PFAS ‘forever chemicals’ in the UK – A way forward – Fidra. https://www.fidra.org.uk/download/regulating-pfas-forever-chemicals-in-the-uk-a-way-forward/.
  14. Environment Agency. PFAS-Evaluating the economic burden of remediating high-risk sites. (2023).
  15. Wildlife and Countryside Link. Gaps may be left in toxic forever chemical regulation reforms warn nature experts. https://www.wcl.org.uk/gaps-may-be-left-in-toxic-forever-chemical-regulation-reforms-warn-nature-experts.asp.
  16. van Gerwen, M. et al. Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) exposure and thyroid cancer risk. EBioMedicine 97, (2023).
  17. Zahm, S. et al. Carcinogenicity of perfluorooctanoic acid and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid. Lancet Oncol 25, (2024).
  18. Rickard, B. P., Rizvi, I. & Fenton, S. E. Per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and female reproductive outcomes: PFAS elimination, endocrine-mediated effects, and disease. Toxicology 465, 153031 (2022).
  19. Hærvig, K. K. et al. Maternal Exposure to Per-and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) and Male Reproductive Function in Young Adulthood: Combined Exposure to Seven PFAS. Environ Health Perspect 130, 1–11 (2022).
  20. Beck, I. H. et al. Association Between Prenatal and Early Postnatal Exposure to Perfluoroalkyl Substances and IQ Score in 7-Year-Old Children From the Odense Child Cohort. Am J Epidemiol 192, 1522–1535 (2023).
  21. Ames, J. L., Sharma, V. & Lyall, K. Effects of Early-life PFAS Exposure on Child Neurodevelopment: A Review of the Evidence and Research gaps. Curr Environ Health Rep 12, 9 (2025).
  22. Stein, C. R., McGovern, K. J., Pajak, A. M., Maglione, P. J. & Wolff, M. S. Perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances and indicators of immune function in children aged 12–19 y: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Pediatric Research 2016 79:2 79, 348–357 (2015).
  23. Padula, A. M., Salihovic, S., Zazara, D. E., Diemert, A. & Arck, P. C. Prenatal per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in relation to antibody titers and infections in childhood. Environ Res 270, 120976 (2025).
  24. Hyötyläinen, T. et al. In utero exposures to perfluoroalkyl substances and the human fetal liver metabolome in Scotland: a cross-sectional study. Lancet Planet Health 8, e5–e17 (2024).
  25. Wildlife and Countryside Link. Hair and blood of UK politicians and environmentalists polluted by harmful chemicals. 2024 https://www.wcl.org.uk/hair-blood-of-uk-politicians-and-environmentalists-polluted-by-chemicals.asp.
  26. O’Rourke, E. et al. Anthropogenic Drivers of Variation in Concentrations of Perfluoroalkyl Substances in Otters (Lutra lutra) from England and Wales. Environ Sci Technol 56, 1675–1687 (2022).
  27. EWG. Interactive map: PFAS contamination in wildlife. https://www.ewg.org/interactive-maps/pfas_in_wildlife2/map/.
  28. Agency, E. Poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS): sources, pathways and environmental data – report. (2021).
  29. Donley, N. et al. Forever Pesticides: A Growing Source of PFAS Contamination in the Environment. Environ Health Perspect 132, (2024).
  30. FERA. PESTICIDES USAGE STATISTICS. https://pusstats.fera.co.uk/home.
  31. Pesticide Action Network International. PAN International List of Highly Hazardous Pesticides (HHPs) March 2021. (2021).
  32. PAN UK. ‘Forever chemicals’ found in UK food – Pesticide Action Network UK. https://www.pan-uk.org/pfas-forever-chemicals/ (2024).
  33. World Health Organization, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations & Inter-Organization Programme for the Sound Management of Chemicals. The International Code of Conduct on Pesticide Management : Guidelines on Highly Hazardous Pesticides. (2016).
  34. Health & Safety Executive. Active substances approved for use in pesticides. https://www.hse.gov.uk/pesticides/active-substances/register.htm.
  35. Fidra. PFAS Active Substances in UK Pesticides. www.fidra.org.uk (2024).
  36. Wu, J. yi, Ding, F. ge, Shen, Z. wei, Hua, Z. lin & Gu, L. Linking microbiomes with per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in soil ecosystems: Microbial community assembly, stability, and trophic phylosymbiosis. Chemosphere 305, (2022).
  37. Cao, L., Xu, W., Wan, Z., Li, G. & Zhang, F. Occurrence of PFASs and its effect on soil bacteria at a fire-training area using PFOS-restricted aqueous film-forming foams. iScience 25, (2022).
  38. Müller, V., Feldmann, J., Prieler, E. & Brodschneider, R. PFAS in the buzz: Seasonal biomonitoring with honey bees (Apis mellifera) and bee-collected pollen. Environmental Pollution 382, 126750 (2025).
  39. PAN UK. ‘Forever chemicals’ found in UK food – Pesticide Action Network UK. Preprint at https://www.pan-uk.org/pfas-forever-chemicals/ (2024).
  40. Andersen, H. R., Grandjean, P., Main, K. M., Jensen, T. K. & Nielsen, F. Higher serum concentrations of PFAS among pesticide exposed female greenhouse workers. Int J Hyg Environ Health 255, 114292 (2024).
  41. Joerss, H. et al. Pesticides can be a substantial source of trifluoroacetate (TFA) to water resources. Environ Int 193, 109061 (2024).
  42. Fidra. Concentrations of Trifluoroacetic Acid (TFA) in UK Surface Waters. https://www.fidra.org.uk/download/concentrations-of-trifluoroacetic-acid-tfa-in-uk-surface-waters/ (2025).
  43. ECHA. All news – ECHA. https://echa.europa.eu/fr/-/echa-publishes-pfas-restriction-proposal (2023).
  44. French Ministry of Ecological Transition. Plan d’actions Ministériel Sur Les PFAS. (2023).
  45. Denmark Ministry of the Environment. Magnus Heunicke wants to ban PFAS in firefighting foam at training sites – Ministry of the Environment. https://mim.dk/nyheder/pressemeddelelser/2023/januar/magnus-heunicke-vil-forbyde-pfas-i-brandslukningsskum-paa-oevelsespladser (2023).